People may think it’s a little too early to decide whether J.D. Vance will become the Republican candidate in 2027 with a fighting chance to ever win the presidency in 2028.
It doesn’t take rocket science to tell you the the people of this country voted for change. You would think that the electorate has now decided that they will only vote for someone that will bring that change.
Let me explain why Vice President J.D. Vance doesn’t have a cold chance in hell to win.
He backed President Trump in every Senate vote where some caused misery and death to the American people. I doubt if anybody voting in 2028 with the known facts at hand will vote for him. Let me explain.
J.D. Vance has a history that will never be erased concerning his tie-breaking votes in the U.S. Senate at the President of the Senate.
Vice President Kamala Harris cast 33 votes to Vance’s 9. As President of the U.S. Senate under Joe Biden, she did her job. So up front you would think that Kamala Harris votes affected the people more than did Vance’s.
Actually it’s totally the opposite. I can list Joe Biden’s VP here, but what is important now is the current Vice-President, because his name is being floated around as a contender for the President’s job in 2028.
On January 14, 2026, The Senate voted 50-50 on a point of order on “A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.” Vance broke the tie in favor of the point of order.
On July 15, 2025, the Senate voted 50-50 on a motion to proceed on H.R. 4 – Recissions Act of 2025. Vance broke the tie in favor of the motion.
The Rescissions Act of 2025 (H.R. 4, Public Law 119-28) is a U.S. federal law enacted on July 24, 2025. It cancels approximately $9 billion in previously appropriated federal funds. The legislation was passed following a proposal by the Trump administration under the procedures of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. It targets unobligated balances across two main areas listed in two key provisions and cuts listed immediately below.
- International Assistance and Foreign Aid (~$7.9 billion): Rescinds funding from the Department of State, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and related entities. Affected areas include international organizations, peacekeeping activities, global health programs (excluding specific funds for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, nutrition, and maternal/child health), migration and refugee assistance, and development assistance.
J.D. Vance was responsible for rescinding funds from the Department of State. The vote destroyed USAID. Peace keeping agencies around the world were affected with the loss of funds. Health programs stopped getting funding for important research needed around the globe.
- Corporation for Public Broadcasting (~$1.1 billion): Eliminates federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) for fiscal years 2026 and 2027, impacting public television (PBS) and public radio (NPR) stations and associated local programming.
J.D. Vance was responsible for eliminating operating funds for CPB, PBS and NPR. The humaine position is WHY? Why did he want to put an end to the Public Broadcasting Network? Why did he want to impact public telivision and public radio? It just did not affect the United States, it affected the whole world.
On July 1, 2025, The Senate voted 50-50 to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Vance broke the tie to pass the bill.
The Senate voted 50-50 to approve an amendment proposed by the late Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The bill gave tax deductions to the rich by taking from the poor. History being made every day, evidence of the effects of the bill that is affecting every day Americans will come out in the open to be forever documented in the history books. Vance broke the tie to approve the amendment. The Senate voted 50-50 to approve an amendment proposed by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Vance broke the tie to approve the amendment.
On April 30, 2025, when Trump was in full swing passing tarrifs that would destroy relations between the United States and major global countries around the world, the Senate voted 49-49 to table a joint resolution to terminate the national emergency related to global tariffs. Vance brok the tie in favor of tabling the resolution.
On January 24, 2025, the Senate voted 50-50 on the nomination of Pete Hegseth to be Secretary of Defense. Vance broke the tie to confirm Hegseth as the secretary.
Thanks to J.D. Vance vote breaker tie, Pete Hegseth has become the worst Secretary of Defense the United States of America has EVER had. As a signal of power, Trump and Hegseth decided to change the name of the department to the “Secretary of War” to signal strength. Instead, in Iran the opposite has happened. Not only is the United States still in a war with Iran that Hegseth doesn’t know how to get out of, According to the Pentagon’s official tally. According to the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS), the Pentagon’s official tally of U.S. service member fatalities connected to operations surrounding the war with Iran stands at 23 deaths (comprising 11 hostile deaths from enemy action and 12 non-hostile deaths).
Pete Hegseth alone with Donald J. Trump, is responsible for directing operations that killed the ‘boat people’ in the newly named ‘Gulf of America’, which has been called ‘forever’ as the ‘Gulf of Mexico’. Hegseth in conjunction with Trump, carried an attack or what can only be called a war on Venesuela. Incumbent Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured from Venezuela. This was a true violation in International Law.
- Violation of Sovereignty and the UN Charter: Most international legal scholars, the United Nations (including warnings from UN officials like Rosemary DiCarlo), and multiple foreign governments view the operation as an unlawful use of force and a direct violation of Venezuelan sovereignty and the UN Charter.
- Lack of Justification: Critics argue that the operation lacked a UN Security Council mandate and did not meet the legal threshold for self-defense, noting that criminal allegations or drug-trafficking charges do not constitute an armed attack that justifies military intervention under international law.
- U.S. Arguments: The Trump administration defended the action as a law-enforcement operation executed to serve active U.S. criminal indictments (such as narco-terrorism and drug-trafficking charges) and framed it as part of combatting unlawful cartels. However, legal experts emphasize that unilateral enforcement power remains strictly territorial under international law.
SO LET’S BE HONEST HERE. DOES ANYONE THINK THAT J.D. VANCE CAN EVER QUALIFY IN AMERICANS MINDS AS THEIR NEXT LEADER OF THE UNITED STATES, SOMEONE WHO SUPPORTED DONALD J. TRUMP’S DESIRES TO SOW DIVISION THROUGHOUT THE WORLD?
ABSOLUTELY NOT!